SDT Model
A decentralized way in crypto asset management
Reimagining Trust in Crypto Asset Management: The SDT Model
The recent collapses of centralized asset managers have sent shockwaves through the financial industry. Billions of dollars were lost as firms deviated from their core mandate: managing client assets with integrity. Instead, many violated legal agreements or outright misappropriated funds.
For centuries, asset management has evolved—embracing new technologies, services, and strategies—yet its foundation remains unchanged: trust. Critical questions persist:
Can investors trust portfolio managers?
Will managers consistently act in clients’ interests?
Can managers rely on investor commitments?
Leading firms endure market cycles precisely because they honor this trust. Regrettably, crypto asset management has strayed from this principle. Whether due to the industry’s early volatility, offshore operations with lax regulation, or unchecked greed, the outcome is clear: trust has been compromised.
But this need not be our future. Crypto’s original ethos—openness, transparency, and trustworthiness—inspired its creation. Now, we must harness its technologies to rebuild asset management.
Introducing the SDT Model: A Decentralized Framework
We propose a paradigm shift through the SDT Model (Self-custodian on-chain, Decentralized pool management, Transaction/strategy on-chain). By embedding smart contracts into the asset management lifecycle, we operationalize crypto’s core values:
1. Self-Custody On-Chain
Custody via auditable smart contracts
Separation of asset ownership (investors) and management (pool managers)
Investors retain withdrawal rights via private keys; managers execute strategies only This eliminates centralized custodial risk—preventing fund misappropriation regardless of service quality.
2. Decentralized Pool Management
Pool lifecycle terms codified in smart contracts
Management exclusively contract-based
All manager actions transparently recorded on-chain This automates compliance, replacing fallible legal agreements with immutable execution.
3. On-Chain Transactions/Strategies
Exclusively on-chain asset trading
Interactions limited to vetted decentralized protocols
Protocol engagement bound by pool terms via smart contracts This ensures strategy execution aligns with mandates, making true decentralization feasible.
Addressing Security: The Triple-Layer Framework
Rising DeFi threats—phishing, key leaks, contract exploits—demand robust solutions. Our Triple-Layer Security Model provides full-lifecycle protection:
Layer 1: Contract Security Time locks, multi-sig wallets, asset allowlists, and bot custody to secure core operations.
Layer 2: End-to-End Contract Management Immutable third-party protocol bindings and emergency response systems.
Layer 3: Lifecycle Security Services Continuous audits, real-time monitoring, and scalable emergency support.
Our goal: An open-source security standard enabling DeFi protocols to launch and scale safely.
Limitations and Mitigations
The SDT Model has constraints:
Human Bias in Protocol Selection Teams may choose flawed or self-serving on-chain assets/protocols. Solution: Decentralized governance transitioning decisions to the community.
Protocol Reliability Decay Trusted protocols may become vulnerable over time. Solution: Continuous monitoring and adaptive adjustments.
Inherent Protocol Risks Malicious actors exploit vulnerabilities globally. Solution: Sustained highest-risk management standards.
The Path Forward
The future of crypto asset management hinges on a choice: Will we embrace openness, transparency, and trust—or repeat past failures? The tools exist. At DeSyn, we champion the SDT Model to rebuild trust where it matters most: in the safekeeping and growth of your assets.
The next chapter is ours to write.
Sincerely, DeSyn Team
Last updated